News reports were filled with the words “Mad Cow Disease” earlier this year. A dairy cow diagnosed with BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy)—also known as “mad cow disease”—was discovered in December 2003 on a dairy farm in the state of Washington, but it had been purchased in Canada where another case was discovered last year. Evidence suggests that BSE may be transmitted to humans, through BSE-contaminated meat, causing a fatal variant form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Cases have been documented in the United Kingdom, but no cases have been reported in the United States.

Veterinary scientist Robert Van Saun believes American beef producers and consumers are going to see economic impacts of the BSE scare for a long time after the issue fades from newspaper headlines.

It may have faded from the newspapers since January, but a veterinary scientist in our college says the economic impacts of the BSE scare will be around for a long time.

Because no more cows with BSE were found in this country, and probably thanks to measures quickly taken by the U.S. Department of Agriculture—including destroying hundreds of cattle—beef worries have eased so much in this country that sales are approaching levels attained before the BSE discovery. It may seem as though this BSE episode is behind us.

But not so, says veterinary scientist Robert Van Saun. “Even though the USDA closed its BSE investigation, the BSE-caused crisis is far from over. The economic effects from the scare are going to go on and on and on.”

For instance, because BSE was found in a “downer” cow, the USDA declared that products from downer cows may no longer enter the food chain, even from animals that have no pathological problem and are just lame. The agency also mandated that cow bone, meat, and blood products may no longer be fed to cattle. Those rulings have enormous ramifications, according to Van Saun.

“Only about half of a cow is actually used as beef, and the other half of the carcass is left after the butchering process,” Van Saun points out. “Previously, renderers used the carcasses to produce high-protein products such as meat and bone meal and blood meal, which were sold and fed to cattle. But those products were implicated in spreading BSE in the Great Britain outbreak. So now, the carcasses must go into landfills or be buried on the farm, a practice that has environmental implications. This practice will also limit the availability of high-risk animals for evaluation for the presence of BSE through the governmental monitoring program.”

Because beef producers now must pay to dispose of carcasses and all downer cows, the price of beef is sure to rise, Van Saun warns. “I am not trivializing Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease—it’s a horrible disease, and the first concern everybody had, obviously, was to be certain that BSE was not in the food supply. And the risk is really quite small now. But this must be put into context for the public: we are going to pay a tremendous price for zero tolerance for BSE.

“The government has put more stringent firewalls in place to maintain a zero tolerance for BSE. Those firewalls are going to have more ramifications for the citizens of Pennsylvania than the disease itself.”

Now that beef producers no longer can feed protein products rendered from cattle carcasses to cattle, producers will have to turn to soybeans. “That means they will be competing with humans for protein,” Van Saun says. “What if there is a drought in the Midwest and the soybean yield is way down? Will we stop feeding cows?

“People don’t realize that cows are the greatest recyclers in the world,” he adds. “They can eat all sorts of things, and the bacteria in their rumen turn it into milk and meat. For instance, cattle producers are now banned from feeding poultry litter, an excellent source of nitrogen. So now that will have to be put on the land or in a landfill. But we all know excess nitrogen is a problem for our streams, lakes, and ultimately the Chesapeake Bay. These things are all interconnected.”

Van Saun wonders whether we have enough land to dispose of the excess agricultural products, noting that “we barely have the land to get rid of the garbage we generate now.” He predicts that the fallout from the BSE scare will lead to higher production and processing costs, higher food prices, and higher landfill costs.

“What will the environmental impact be when we start putting all this organic material into the land?” he asks. “There is some thought that these decisions were made too quickly primarily to address concerns of overseas beef importers, and there is speculation that as the public gets perspective on the issue, some of these regulations might be adjusted to conform to scientific knowledge of BSE disease risk.”

—Jeff Mulhollem